09 December 2004

Validator, XHTML, 9-Dec-04 UTC 00:54:36

Status: Feed readable, minor correction discretionary.

Error: tag not closed

Sample feed reports invalid. Comments
Sample Outstanding Validation Report

Summary

Notice: Minor errors, easily fixable, and outlines exactly where the user needs to go.

Report

Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML parser.

Line 182, column 289: end tag for "img" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified

...a=0" alt="web tracker" border="0"></a> </noscript>

You may have neglected to close a tag, or perhaps you meant to "self-close" a tag; that is, ending it with "/>" instead of ">". [MudTest: Awesome! Exactly showing what might be wrong, by line.]

Line 182, column 178: start tag was here

...ww.statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://c3.statcounter.com/cou



The feed may not be valid, but the readers can still read it.

A feed can be invalid, but still "good enough" for the pipeline to handle. No worries! The reader doesn't care if there's a missing > or < ; they can still read the content.

For that matter, the feed aggregators or the search engines really care. It still show up. That's all the matters.

Good enough! Great work!

Status: Feed readable, minor correction discretionary.

Error: tag not closed

Sample feed reports invalid. Comments
Sample Outstanding Validation Report

Summary

Notice: Minor errors, easily fixable, and outlines exactly where the user needs to go.

Report

Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML parser.

Line 182, column 289: end tag for "img" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified

...a=0" alt="web tracker" border="0"></a> </noscript>

You may have neglected to close a tag, or perhaps you meant to "self-close" a tag; that is, ending it with "/>" instead of ">". [MudTest: Awesome! Exactly showing what might be wrong, by line.]

Line 182, column 178: start tag was here

...ww.statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://c3.statcounter.com/cou



The feed may not be valid, but the readers can still read it.

A feed can be invalid, but still "good enough" for the pipeline to handle. No worries! The reader doesn't care if there's a missing > or < ; they can still read the content.

For that matter, the feed aggregators or the search engines really care. It still show up. That's all the matters.

Good enough! Great work!

" />